In this blog post I will be writing an analysis of two different pieces of
work by two different painters, both of which are different types of collages.
The first collage I will be analysing in detail was created by Antoni Tapies
who was a Spanish painter, sculptor and art theorist born in Barcelona on
December 13, 1923. In 1958, Tapies was awarded the first prize for painting at
the Pittsburgh international, and the UNESCO AND David E. Bright Prizes at the
Venice Biennale for his contributions to the art community. The piece of his I
will be analysing in detail is entitled Arrow (shown above) which is a collage
produced in 1988 using mixed media such as lithography and card. Due to the
process of lithography, the image which is shown above, for the most part, is actually
a reverse or negative replication of an original piece consisting of a polymer
coating. Therefore, for example, the apparent curved ‘arrow’ in the piece which
is shown in the centre right pointing towards the right, would have actually
have been on the centre towards the left pointing left on the original piece
along with other aspects of the piece.
There are two prominent colours in this piece, being red and brown. Red can
have many different connotations such as that of danger, blood, anger, passion,
fire and sacrifice and therefore I think it is important to note that in this piece
it is not the prominent part of the work, instead the colour brown which is
shown by what appears to be a piece of card takes up the most space in the
centre of the piece which lies on top of the red. I feel that the composite colour
of brown could be used in this piece of art to represent nature due to its dirt
like appearance created by combining red, black and yellow and being a part of
the human appearance, such as hair colour, eye colour and skin pigmentation, I
also think that the reasoning behind their being a distinct line between two
shades of brown could be to represent the world in which Tapies felt he lived
in, a world in which people were separated due to their skin colour, a world in
which racism and other forms of discrimination took place back in the late
eighties, therefore by putting an arrow between the two sides, (note that the
darker side is more prominent which would be an accurate representative of
those with generally darker skin tones in the world compared to lighter tones)
Tapies could be suggesting that people need to join one another in harmony. The
arrow is shown in black which is the very darkest of colours owing to its
complete absorption of light, making it the opposite of white. I feel as if
this arrow is black in order to symbolize the fact that many people find it
harder than others to realize why it is important that the people of the world
need to come together and overcome war of which could be represented by the red
due to its connotations and the fact that it is actually underneath the brown,
which implies that it is not an important part of life and that anger is the underlining
problem causing such discrimination.
The next piece in which I will be analysing (seen bellow) was created by Holly Thoburn,
who is an English painter born and raised in and around London who draws inspiration
for her work from aspects of city life, such as street art e.g. graffiti tags
and numerous different natural and non-natural textures which are found in her
work. Since 2002, she has had more than twenty solo exhibitions all around the
world from London, England to Los Angeles, USA. The removal and multiple layers
of media on canvas such as acrylic which is found in this piece (which is
entitled Earl & Duke (2009)) is evident in all of Thoburn’s work. In this piece,
despite there being a combination of very dark and light tones, the two do not
seem to contrast too much due to her use of removal as a technique. As a whole
I feel that this piece feels very cold due to its blue tint which is most
notable in the centre of the piece, meaning that I have an almost polar opposite
feeling towards this piece than 'Arrow' due to the differences in their colour schemes. Unlike ‘Arrow’, the layering of this piece
seems to be a lot harder to recognise due to its enormous amount of complexity
on a relatively small canvas (70cm x 70cm). The one aspect of this piece which
stands out the most in my opinion is that of what I assume is a graffiti tag
created with pink spray paint which can easily be seen as being one of the
final layers of the piece as it appears to be the most intact.
No comments:
Post a Comment